Give my baby John your beat A holy, holy, on repeat A rap on your consuming power An urgent message for the hour
Bless my Lydia with your dance And strong refrain of sweet romance Of faithfulness and security A pas de deux in purity
Preserve my wife with your grand piano And a sanctifying sweet soprano A host of angels on each side Of the aisle for the chosen bride
Restore my life with your violin Of forgiveness of my deepest sins To evermore on you depend And sing a song that never ends
“God is the ultimate musician. His music transforms your life. The notes of redemption rearrange your heart and restore your life. His songs of forgiveness, grace, reconciliation, truth, hope, sovereignty, and love give you back your humanity and restore your identity.” – Paul David Tripp, A Quest for More (Greensboro, NC; New Growth Press, 2007), 145.
I was on the cross country team in high school. I forget why I even joined, but I’m glad I did. My brother was the athletic and popular one. He was more social and friendly. And the gals loved him because he was strong and good-looking. I was the sharp-edged, skinny, asthmatic nerd.
I remember the practices, especially the first few practices. That was some tough sledding. I tried to make up for how weak and slow I was by using humor. But it didn’t work. Phil C., Phil my brother, Mark, Nick, Ryan, and the others were fast and serious about putting in a good practice. Me? I was desperate for it to end. And if I forgot my asthma puff that day it was hellish.
Mom and Dad showed up to some of my races, and I remember the tears on my father’s face. Here was their son who had been admitted who-knows-how-many-times to the emergency room for asthma attacks, who had been on medication his entire youth. Who was taken to the Children’s Hospital in a helicopter after the doctors learned I had pneumothorax. Here I was running a 5K, and they stared in wonder and swelled with pride.
I could have finished a race in 35 minutes and it wouldn’t have mattered. My dad was proud and it felt good. Before my Dad, I felt loved and cherished. Before the team I was embarrassed for being so slow. But they were nice about it.
It was the only school sport I ever did. My best time was around 21:30. The only other sport I did in my teens, if you count it as as sport, was roller hockey. My real game of choice was StarCraft.
Listening to Mark, a teammate, make trouble and banter during our practices and trips alone made it worth it. Once in the team’s van he mooned a car behind us. The driver of that car was so angry he drove in front of us and slammed on his breaks. Hilarious and scary at the same time. Another time he ate a huge Whopper minutes before a race, ran like a horse, and then threw it up immediately afterward, enjoying every minute of it. The coach as upset but we were rolling with laughter. Mark was beloved in the school. He had a jolly personality. I socially looked up to him. He made me feel special by giving me a good new nickname, “Shaf”. “What’s up, Shaf?” Around my fellow computer nerds and armchair philosophers I was Aaron. Around the cross country team I was Shaf. To this day it feels good to be called Shaf by a friend.
But Mark’s troublemaking crossed the line and ended his running revelry. On one trip, a few on the team (including Mark) had some wine in a hotel room (don’t worry, my brother wasn’t involved and never would have been). Someone snitched on them and they got booted. That meant two things to me: Mark was no longer going to be on the team, and I was going to make varsity.
I missed Mark, and I didn’t have a real interest in making the varsity team. But I felt proud for getting the varsity letter (for the jacket I never purchased). And I think my whole family enjoyed the irony of God’s goodness. Their asthmatic son/brother making varsity in cross country? Only when pigs flew. Well, the pigs grew wings that year.
Asking, “Why evangelize the lost if God has already predestined the elect to be saved?” is like asking a surgeon, “Why do surgery on the sick if God has predestined many to be healed through surgery?”
“And when they could not come nigh unto Him for the press, they uncovered the roof where he was: and when they had broken it up, they let down the bed wherein the sick of the palsy lay.” –Mark 2:4
Faith is full of inventions. The house was full, a crowd blocked up the door, but faith found a way of getting at the Lord and placing the palsied man before Him. If we cannot get sinners where Jesus is by ordinary methods we must use extraordinary ones. It seems, according to Luke 5:19, that a tiling had to be removed, which would make dust and cause a measure of danger to those below, but where the case is very urgent we must not mind running some risks and shocking some proprieties. Jesus was there to heal, and therefore fall what might, faith ventured all so that her poor paralyzed charge might have his sins forgiven. O that we had more daring faith among us! Cannot we, dear reader, seek it this morning for ourselves and for our fellow-workers, and will we not try to-day to perform some gallant act for the love of souls and the glory of the Lord.
The world is constantly inventing; genius serves all the purposes of human desire: cannot faith invent too, and reach by some new means the outcasts who lie perishing around us? It was the presence of Jesus which excited victorious courage in the four bearers of the palsied man: is not the Lord among us now? Have we seen His face for ourselves this morning? Have we felt His healing power in our own souls? If so, then through door, through window, or through roof, let us, breaking through all impediments, labour to bring poor souls to Jesus. All means are good and decorous when faith and love are truly set on winning souls. If hunger for bread can break through stone walls, surely hunger for souls is not to be hindered in its efforts. O Lord, make us quick to suggest methods of reaching Thy poor sin-sick ones, and bold to carry them out at all hazards.
Even if someone isn’t doing outreach the same way we are, may he bless each and every creative endeavor done in faith.
There seems to be three themes in discussions over evangelism:
1. Contextualization for the sake of Christ. This refers to our attempt as Christians to appropriately accommodate and adapt to culture so that we can best communicate the grace and truth of Christ, especially the gospel. It often involves a kind of humbling and discomfort on our part, of doing things in ways that aren’t familiar to us.
2. Conflict for the sake of Christ. This refers to our struggle with the world system around us which tries to silence or neutralize our message. It involves our countercultural endeavor to help people see the other-worldliness of the kingdom of God. I regard this as a subtheme of contextualization, because thoughtful consideration of a culture can be the very thing that helps us understand the need for a countercultural method.
3. Using spiritual gifts for the sake of Christ. This refers to our calling as Christians to use our talents and desires which God has given us. God wants each one of us to be good stewards of the special graces he has equipped us with.
We have to somehow integrate all three of these themes and not let any one take over in a way that justifies our own passions or selfish ambitions. It isn’t easy. Our flesh inclines us to contextualization as a worldly way to avoid suffering and feel good about relationships, to conflict as a worldly way of avoiding gentleness and patience, and to the abuse of our gifts as a way to justify bringing glory and attention to ourselves.
Even when we don’t agree with our Christian brothers, I think we need to cut them a lot of slack, particularly when it is evident their philosophy of ministry is centered around a thoughtful love that endures at least a meaningful degree of suffering and practices patience with very difficult people.
The longer I live, the dumber I feel on this whole matter. And I have a bad taste in my mouth when it comes to people who think they are experts on being “missional”. It too often is just a highbrow way of letting sociology or individual preferences or cowardice or personal ambition dominate. To those who read part of that and think, “boy, that sounds like Aaron when he…”, I am sorry.
Behind the various theories and practices of textual interpretation lurk larger philosophical issues. Indeed, implicit in the question of meaning are questions about the nature of reality, the possibility of knowledge, and the criteria for morality. It may not be at all obvious that one is taking a position on these issues when one picks up a book and begins to read, but I will argue that that is indeed the case. Whether there is something really “there” in the text is a question of the “metaphysics” of meaning. Similarly, reading implies some beliefs about whether it is possible to understand a text, and if so, how. Whether there is something to be known in texts is a question of the “epistemology” of meaning. Lastly, reading raises questions about what obligations, if any, impinge on the reader of Scripture or any other text. What readers do with what is in the text gives rise to questions concerning the “ethics” of meaning. Together, these three issues give rise to a related question, “What is it to be human, an agent of meaning?”
Vanhoozer, Kevin. Is There a Meaning in This Text?, p. 19. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.