I love life

Mac & cheese & cartoons with the kiddos

I love life. I love seeing my kids sloppily bring up the spoon of cereal and milk to their tired faces in the morning. I love Lydia’s dramatic requests for milk or food in the morning. I love John’s almost-immediate observations about life and random things when he wakes up. I love Lydia’s militant insistence that everyone give a hug and kiss in the morning before leaving. I love giving my wife a subtle smile and kiss on the cheek before I leave. I love getting in the car and having a conversation with John Caleb. I love listening to the precious words that bring me life from the Bible on the daily-Bible-reading podcast. I love hitting the gym with my ever-polite and intelligent friend Braden and running around the track. I love practicing dribbling and shooting with the alternately celebratory and dismayed John Caleb. I love going to the coffee shop before work and doing some reading. I love my co-workers and my job. I love web development and lately, especially JavaScript, which I’d never dreamed of using on the server. I love the beautiful snow on the mountains of Utah. I love coming home and hearing the eruptions of joy from the kids, and hearing about my wife’s day of teaching. I love eating dinner with the family, even though Stacie and I struggle to have an adult-conversation as the kids chatter like chirping birds. Chirp chirp chirp! I love Lydia’s intensity over everything. I love reading about the Bible and theology. I love evangelism, even when the conversations are difficult. I love my friends who do evangelism. I love exulting over beautiful and big things. I love God, who both sends lullabies of love and terrifying lightening bolts of awesome power. I love our church and our Bible-nerd pastor. I love my wife, who is far better to me than I am to her. I love my friends, who are far better to me than I am to them.

The Lord gives, and the Lord takes away. Blessed be the name of the Lord.

Assorted Christmas thoughts

Christmas: not that man became a God, but that God became a man. Not that a male impregnated Mary, but that Jesus was conceived with zero male participation.

Was Jesus already a man before the incarnation? No.

When did Jesus become a man? At the incarnation.

What is the significance? He stooped down in humility, servanthood, love, and condescension.

Was he a demigod, or a superman? No. He, fully God, became fully man.

Did Jesus become a man to become more fully God? No, he was already fully God, and become a man, not by progressing his divine nature, nor by subtracting from his divine nature, but by adding a fully human nature.

Further reading: John 1 and Philippians 2.


The significance of virgin birth is much like significance of Genesis 1, especially in Ancient Near Eastern context: It was an act of creation requiring no physical contact or sexual union, accomplished by the effortless, omnipotent word of God.

Definition of “virgin birth”: zero male participation. But keep in mind: God the Father isn’t male.


OT/NT creation parallels:

Genesis 1:1 vs John 1:1
“In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.”
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”

Genesis 2:4 & Matthew 1:1
“These are the generations of the heavens and the earth when they were created…”
“The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ…”

Genesis 1:2 & Luke 1:35
“And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters.”
“The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you.”


“Matthew’s description of the Holy Spirit’s role in Mary’s virginal conception sets the account apart from any alleged Greco-Roman parallels, since parallels from the broader pagan world all depend upon a god having sexual intercourse with a human. Matthew excludes any hint of such activity from his description of the conception.” (Köstenberger, The First Days of Jesus)


Neat truth I got to share with Lydia: Jesus also had an adoptive father! Joseph.


Who supplied the Y-chromosome in Jesus’ conception? Christianity: The Spirit created it by an effortless, touchless, omnipotent act. “That which is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.” (Matthew 1:20; cf. Luke 1:35) 100% of the DNA was mortal, and none of the DNA was transferred from any divine being.


Why such a long genealogy to begin the birth narrative of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew?

Abraham? David? Deportation to Babylon? Who cares?

Some background:

– When cursing Adam and Eve, God says to the serpent: “I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel.” (Genesis 3:15) Someday, a descendant of Eve and Satan would have an epic showdown.

– God calls Abraham: “I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing.” (Genesis 12:2)

– Jacob to his son: “The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until tribute comes to him; and to him shall be the obedience of the peoples.” (Genesis 49:10)

– Nathan to David: “And your house and your kingdom shall be made sure forever before me. Your throne shall be established forever.” (2 Samuel 7:16)

A descendant of Eve, a descendant of Abraham, a descendant of Judah, a descendant of David. Who will it be?

After David, the nation declines. David’s descendants are scumbags. So much idolatry. Prophets warn the people: judgment is coming. Assyria and Babylon conquer Israel (722 BC) and Judah (586 BC). Exile. Pitiful return of the Jews.

The situation is dire. The Psalmist cries out in pain: “Where is your steadfast love of old, which by your faithfulness you swore to David?” (Psalm 89:49)

> “Why has God abandoned his promises? Why has he broken his covenant? … The promised offspring of the woman has not (yet) come. The world has not yet been set right. Blessing has not come to the world through Abraham’s descendants. The scepter has departed from the line of Judah. David’s kingdom has been defeated and lost, and no Davidic ruler reigns to mediate God’s blessings to the nations.” (First Days of Jesus)

Enter Matthew chapter 1 verse 1. “The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham…”


Four notable features of the genealogy of Jesus in the Gospel of Matthew (quoting here from “The First Days of Jesus”):

1. “The first two Greek words of the New Testament, biblos geneseōs (“The Book of the Genealogy”), mirror the language used to introduce creation itself and the genealogy connected to Adam. The use of this language points the attentive reader back to the creation of the world and links Jesus’s genealogy to God’s original plan for his creation.

2. “Second, the inclusion of four women in the genealogy is unusual, particularly in light of the fact that each of the women was an outsider to Israel with a questionable background. Most ancient genealogies excluded women, particularly women who may have tarnished the family line. Matthew does the opposite… The inclusion of these non-Israelite women foreshadows the spread of the gospel to the Gentiles and bears witness to the grace of God that actively seeks to forgive and restore sinners and to reach out to those who are marginalized and viewed as outsiders.

3. “Third, Mary falls in line with these other women by conceiving a child in an unusual, questionable, or surprising manner. The family tree itself anticipates the virgin birth of Jesus by breaking its normal pattern of presenting information….

4. “Fourth, by dividing salvation history into three periods of fourteen generations each (Abraham to David, David to the exile, the exile to Jesus), Matthew communicates the theological truth that God was in control throughout even the most difficult periods of Israel’s history— the Babylonian exile— to move history toward this climactic point in the coming of Jesus the Messiah. Interestingly, Jewish apocalyptic (end-time) literature commonly divided history into set time periods to indicate God’s control and guidance of history. Such divisions also aided memorization in a primarily oral culture, and the use of the number fourteen may have even emphasized the link to David via gematria (numerology).”


December 16, 2017

So much Christmas-related joy in Luke 1-2!

Gabriel to Zechariah:

“You shall call his name John. And you will have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth, for he will be great before the Lord.” (1:13-15)

Elizabeth to Mary:

“Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Spirit, and she exclaimed with a loud cry, “Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb!” (1:41-42)

And Mary:

“My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.” (1:46-47)

And Zechariah:

“Blessed be the Lord God of Israel, for he has visited and redeemed his people” (1:68)

And the angelic host:

“Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased!” (2:14)

And Simeon:

“He took [baby Jesus] up in his arms and blessed God and said, ‘Lord, now you are letting your servant depart in peace, according to your word; for my eyes have seen your salvation'” (2:29-30)

And Anna:

“And coming up at that very hour she began to give thanks to God and to speak of him to all who were waiting for the redemption of Jerusalem.” (2:38)


“Man’s maker was made man, that He, Ruler of the stars, might nurse at His mother’s breast; that the Bread might hunger, the Fountain thirst, the Light sleep, the Way be tired on its journey; that the Truth might be accused of false witness, the Teacher be beaten with whips, the Foundation be suspended on wood; that Strength might grow weak; that the Healer might be wounded; that Life might die.” – Augustine of Hippo (Sermons 191.1)


“Any world with Incarnation and Atonement is a better world than any world without it… This value can’t be aggregated by any creaturely good. So no matter how many excellent creatures there are in the world, no matter how excellent, beautiful, and sinless their lives are, the aggregated value of their lives would not match that of Incarnation and Atonement… And no matter how much sin and suffering a world contains, the aggregated badness would be outweighed by the goodness of Incarnation and Atonement.” (Alvin Plantinga)


“He by whom all things were made was made one of all things. The Son of God by the Father without a mother became the Son of man by a mother without a father. The Word Who is God before all time became flesh at the appointed time. The maker of the sun was made under the sun. He Who fills the world lay in a manger, great in the form of God but tiny in the form of a servant; this was in such a way that neither was His greatness diminished by His tininess, nor was His tininess overcome by His greatness. (St. Augustine, Sermon 187)


“That God upon a throne should be an infant in a cradle; the thundering Creator be a weeping babe and a suffering man, are such expressions of mighty power, as well as condescending love, that they astonish men upon earth, and angels in heaven.” (Stephen Charnock)


The Christian doctrine of the virgin birth is incredible. It entails that:

1. Mary did not conceive Jesus by having pre-marital sex with a man. It wasn’t a cover-up religious story to make up for the fact that she was immoral. The Pharisees insult Jesus, “We were not born of sexual immorality!” (John 8:41) But Jesus wasn’t conceived the way they assumed. Mary and Jesus know this. He tolerates their ugly slander of his mother. For now. Oh, what patience Jesus had…

2. Mary did not conceive Jesus by having sex with a god. “Matthew’s description of the Holy Spirit’s role in Mary’s virginal conception sets the account apart from any alleged Greco-Roman parallels, since parallels from the broader pagan world all depend upon a god having sexual intercourse with a human. Matthew excludes any hint of such activity from his description of the conception.” (Andreas J. Köstenberger, “The First Days of Jesus”)

3. The conception of Jesus was accomplished much like creation was accomplished. The Ancient Near Eastern context of Genesis 1 helps one see how amazing it is.It was accomplished by the effortless, omnipotent word of God. It required no conflict with creation, no sexual activity, no interaction with an enchanted realm, and no physical touch. “Let there be…” Only God can do this.

4. It was fitting for a king. Christ came in such humble circumstances, yet God smiles, and ensures that Christ arrives as true royalty. “Man exalted himself and fell; God humbled himself and raised him up. Christ’s lowliness, what is it? God has stretched out a hand to man laid low. We fell, he descended; we lay low, he stooped. Let us lay hold and rise, that we fall not into punishment. So then his stooping to us is this: ‘Born of the Holy Ghost and the Virgin Mary.’ His very nativity too as man – it is lowly and it is lofty. Whence lowly? That as man he was born of men. Whence lofty? That he was born of a virgin.” (Augustine)

Also see

He sends strangers to encourage me

I get really, really sick of engaging / dealing with Mormonism sometimes. Inevitably drawn back to doing so, but still. Back and forth.

God knows this. He sends strangers to encourage me. One guy walked up to me in Scheel’s today and introduced himself to me and his wife. “We are life-longers.” They had been Mormon for their whole 40+ year life. Just came out of Mormonism three years ago, and now attend a local church. He encouraged me — that the YouTube videos and articles helped along the way. I told him, thanks for the encouragement, and for saying hi.

He might have thought that my response was just a formality or just a polite reaction, and I certainly could have been warmer and more welcoming of him as a brother.

But it really is encouraging.

“Daddy, is God a part of our family?”

“Daddy, is God a part of our family?” (John Caleb)

“Well, God adopted Daddy.” (Me)

Their jaws drop. Mouths open. Silence.

“So when you were a baby, God adopted you?” (John Caleb)

“No, when I was in high school.” (Me)

“What about us?” (John Caleb)

“Yeah, me too!” (Lydia)

“Well if you ask God, he will adopt you too.” (Me)

“Oh. OK.” (John Caleb)

Only the Trinity

Only the Trinity can satisfy the Christian longing to give Jesus Christ unreserved, unabashed, direct worship. “… that everyone will honor the Son, just as they honor the Father.” (John 5:23)

“How many Gods do you worship?” One.

“Do you worship the Son?” Yes.

“Are the Father and the Son one God, or two Gods?” One.

Revelation 5 is blasphemy if the Father and the Son are not the same being. It is joy if God is Triune — three distinct, inseparable persons, and one being, one essence, one God.

Also, only the Trinity can satisfy the human longing to relationally know an ultimate being who is intrinsically relational. If God is only one person, his relationships begin, not continue, with creation. If God is three persons, then creation is the spill-over of intra-Trinitarian relational joy, and our joy is to enter into this fellowship of the Father loving the Son, and the Son loving the Father.

“Religion” and “philosophy”

If “religion” is essentially institutional, then believing and confessing “Mohammed is a true prophet” or “Jesus is Lord” isn’t necessarily religious. Which is absurd.

But if “religion” broadly encompasses “any set of values, beliefs, and practices”, then almost everything we do, including almost everything the government does, is religious.

That “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” is either a narrow or broad restriction, depending on the definition of “religion.”

This reminds me of “philosophy”, which is at minimum just “a way of thinking.” Everyone thinks. Some people are just more thoughtful about their thinking than others. So, your philosophy might not be that philosophical, but it’s still a philosophy. Or something like that.

It is for these reasons that I do not like the terms “religion” and “philosophy”, or “religious” and “philosophical”. People are in denial about just how broad and thorough and pervasive their own philosophy and religion are. Using terms like “religion” and “philosophy” feed our comfortable delusions of compartmentalization. They give us a false sense of security in the supposed sacred vs. secular divide.

We are living, walking, talking, working, breathing centers of beliefs, practices, thoughts, values, and feelings.

An Unexpected Dialog

“Daddy, is Jesus God, and God Jesus?” (John Caleb)

“Yes. And God is three persons: The Father, the Son Jesus, and the Holy Spirit. They have always been together, and they have always been one God. And do you know what?”

“What?”

“The Father looooves the Son Jesus. And do you know what?”

“What?”

“The Son looooves the Father. And the Holy Spirit loves the Father and the Son too. And the Holy Spirit loves the Father loving the Son, and the loves the Son loving the Father.”

“Daddy, BYU is the best team EVER.”

“Huh?”

“Yeah, Anna [classmate?] says they have more candy than any other team.”

The counterintuitive hypocrisy of moral anti-realist atheists

Source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28705377@N04/4198670755/

‎”Moral anti-realist” atheists don’t practice what they preach.

They tell us there are no real objective moral values or duties, and then they participate in transcendent moral causes regarding objective human dignity, rights, and values.

Like a man who says there is no such thing as baseball, and then knocks on your door with his mitt, ball, and bat, and says, “Come play ball!”

Like a man who says there is no such thing as a beautiful sunset, and yet has a beautiful painting of one on his bedroom wall.

Like a woman who says children have no dignity, value, or real beauty, as she rocks her baby, cooing, singing, loving.

Moral anti-realist atheists are hypocrites because they otherwise love and celebrate and participate in what they say doesn’t exist. They are hypocrites for being good neighbors, friends, citizens, human beings — lovers of humanity, lovers of beauty, lovers of a good moral cause. They treat humans like souls, animals like creatures, and life like a meaningful epic to be written.