“Christian”: a title construed as a name, given a Latin suffix and confused with a slave-name

“In Antioch the disciples were first called Christians [Χριστιανούς].” (Acts 11:26)

F. F. Bruce writes, “It is natural that the designation ‘Christian’ should first have been given to the followers of Jesus in Antioch, and by Gentiles.” He explains:

1. This followed a pattern of attaching a Latin suffix to a name. “As the Herodians in the Gospels were adherents of Herod, so the Christians (christianoi) were adherents of Christ (such forms consisting of the stem of a personal name followed by an originally Latin suffix, -ianus).”

2. Non-Christian Jews would have avoided calling Jesus “Christ.” “Greek-speaking Jews at that date would not have referred to Jesus as Christ, for that was still a title (christos, the “anointed” one, corresponding to the Semitic messiah); to refer to him thus would have been to acknowledge him as Messiah.”

3. Gentiles, however, could have construed “Christ” simply as an alternative name. “But in Gentile ears Christ was simply an alternative name for Jesus; it had no such associations for them as it had for Jews.”

4. “Christos” sounded like a common slave-name. “Christos sounded exactly like a fairly common slave-name, Chrēstos (Latin Chrestus), and among Greeks and Romans there was considerable confusion between, the two spellings, as also between christianoi and chrēstianoi.”

5. The slave name sounded so similar, that some scribes copying Acts made the mistake of using it. “Even in Acts 11:26, where it is mentioned that “in Antioch the disciples were for the first time called Christians”, a few Greek witnesses to the text (including the first hand in Codex Sinaiticus) exhibit the spelling chrēstianous (accusative plural) instead of christianous. The latter is certainly what Luke wrote, but the former may well represent what some of the Antiochenes thought they were saying.”

Bruce, F. F. (1977). Paul: Apostle of the Free Spirit (p. 132). Milton Keynes, UK: Paternoster.


The Jesus-movement was otherwise (more internally?) simply called “the Way” (Acts 9:2, 19:9, 19:23, 24:14, 24:22).

Ten observations about Stephen

1. He already had a good reputation before he was chosen to assist the apostles. He was “of good repute, full of the Spirit and of wisdom.” (Acts 6:3)

2. Saul may have attended or visited a synagogue where Stephen attended. Among the synagogues that disputed with Stephen was the synagogue of the Cilicians. Saul was from Tarsus of Cilicia.

3. Stephen did a lot of teaching. “He won’t… shut… up!”

“This man never ceases to speak words against this holy place and the law, for we have heard him say that this Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and will change the customs that Moses delivered to us.”

Acts 6:13–14

4. Stephen, a Hellenistic Jew, was considered an outsider to the Hebrew community. This made his teaching that the Law and temple were fulfilled in Jesus (presumably what he taught given the allegations against him) especially scandalous.

5. Stephen responds to the accusations in a high-stakes juridical setting. But what initially looks like his defense is turned around: Stephen goes on the offensive. He puts his audience on trial.

6. In his speech Stephen gives an overview of Jewish history, but he doesn’t highlight established Jews settled in the Promised Land. Instead, he highlights mistreated and oppressed strangers rescued by God.

7. Stephen mentions the *portable* tabernacle and the *inadequacy* of Solomon’s temple to contain God.

8. Stephen also mentions agents of rescue sent by God but rejected by Israel.

9. Having primed his audience, Stephen climaxes with his own accusation against the council: They follow in this ancestral tradition of murdering God’s agents of rescue. “As your fathers did, so do you.” (7:51)

10. Paul was almost certainly present for this speech. He guarded the coats of those who, immediately after, stoned Stephen. But Paul’s life ended up being a continuation of Stephen’s ministry. Echoes of the theology of Stephen’s speech are later found in Paul’s own teaching. And Paul’s own salvation is an answer to Stephen’s prayer, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” (7:60)


“Various elements in Stephen’s teaching arguably laid a foundation for Saul’s later theological views as a Christian. Stephen’s dramatic declaration of his preference for the diaspora Jews over the people of the land may well have prepared the way for Saul’s vision of ministry to the Gentiles. Stephen’s view of Moses as a type of the One who was to come perhaps laid the groundwork for Paul’s view of the law of Moses as fulfilled in the person, death and resurrection of Christ Jesus (Rom 10:4). Stephen’s rejection of the centrality of the temple may have diminished the significance of the holy place in the mind of Paul, who would see the new covenant people as the “temple of the living God” (1 Cor 3:16-17; 2 Cor 6:16). Henceforth Saul’s view of these various elements — the land of Israel, the Gentiles, the law and the temple — would each undergo radical change.

“Much of Saul’s dramatic reinterpretation of these elements is attributable to Stephen’s words heard in the Hellenistic synagogues, although Saul radically disagreed with them at the time. However, it was Saul’s acknowledgment of Jesus as *the Christ* on the road to Damascus that transformed his comprehension of Stephen’s words and inspired a radical new worldview.”

Paul Barnett, Jesus and the Rise of Early Christianity, 226

Paul wears his heart on his sleeve

The apostle Paul paces back and forth, closes his pitiful eyes, smiles, looks up, sees his audience, and then gushes his heart out to a scribe:

“[Paul] wears his heart on his sleeve. This spontaneity was no doubt facilitated by Paul’s practice of dictating his letters instead of writing them out himself. As he dictates, he sees in his mind’s eye those whom he is addressing and speaks as he would if he were face to face with them.” (“Paul Apostle of the Heart Set Free”, F. F. Bruce, 16)

Hasty Misdirection

I think that we men especially (at least me) have a tendency to say something important and sincere but then quickly clothe it with a humorous joke or roast or light-hearted misdirection.

This too often detracts from the boldness, directness, and felt sincerity of what we genuinely think. It lessens the force of our compliments, criticisms, and encouragements. It makes our relationships thinner than they have to be.

Denial

There is no Love, the mother cried
As she rocked her baby side to side
With lullaby sweet
And melodies soft

There is no Right, the justice penned
As he meted sentence strong
For lawless wrongs
Called sin

There is no Meaning, the author wrote
With words to demonstrate his point
Trusting readers
To understand

There is no God, the hiker said
As he watched the sky wash over red
With hues and radiant beams
Of beauty


I started this poem in 2018 thinking about my dear atheist friend Braden.

Braden was convinced that there was no objective right, wrong, beauty, meaning, true rationality, or God.

And yet he was always so kind and courteous, admiring goodness around him, and reflecting on things far beyond him.

You’ll still have Jesus to reckon with

If you want to be clean from all the disappointment and foolishness and alarmism and resentment in Trump-news, then take a bath in the word of God.

If you don’t have Jesus, then Trump is your highest political leader.

Jesus rules with perfect wisdom and purity and righteousness and compassion and holiness. Anything good from Trump comes from Jesus. And anything bad from Trump will be judged by Jesus. Trump will be gone someday and you’ll still have Jesus to reckon with.

Heaven and Earth will pass away, but the words of Jesus will never pass away.

For Christ and his Church

Countercult parachurch ministry serves the body of Christ when it emphasizes the importance of belonging to, quietly serving at, being invested in, and incubating under a healthy local church with multiple qualified elders and Biblically faithful preaching and discipleship.

We show the broader unity of the real Christian big-C Church by being committed to such local churches as our primary spiritual community.

And we honor Christ in not letting false religion dominate exit-narratives, preaching, apologetics, and gospel conversation. Rather, we let Christ dominate, be Lord of, and reign over all such activity.

“We demolish arguments and every pretension that sets itself up against the knowledge of God, and we take captive every thought to make it obedient to Christ.” (2 Corinthians 10:5)

In thousands of years false temples will be in ragged ruins, toppled, forgotten, much like ancient ruins of Greece. But the words of Christ will stand.

Beautiful Things Repossessed

Michael Gungor and Derek Webb and Jennifer Knapp and Jars of Clay — these fallen musicians were squatters and thieves.

They were borrowing God’s glory. They were producing beautiful things that did not come from themselves.

They never owned it. It flows from God.

They benefitted from what they now rebel against.


Why I sometimes still listen to them: What they once enjoyed has been taken away from them and given to me.

By analogy, they forfeited the kingdom-copyright to their own works.

Adopted as literal children of the Most High

Being an adopted child of the Most High is infinitely more dignifying and significant than being a “literal” spirit child of a regional cosmic patriarch and one of his wives.


Luke Wayne replies,

The children I adopted are literally my children. I am not a figurative or symbolic dad. I am literally their dad. Adoption makes one a literal child.

“What would NOT make me a literal child of God would be to say that I am an eternal, uncreated intelligence which was used as raw material by a pair of highly developed humans to assemble a spirit body and then later allowed me to acquire a physical body that was birthed by a completely different set of human parents who were not yet as advanced as the first. I don’t quite know what THAT would make me, but ‘literal child of God’ is certainly not it.” (Luke Wayne, May 22, 2018)

 

Dawkins vs Kerouac

“The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is, at bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but blind, pitiless indifference.” (Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker)

vs.

“The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved… the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes “Awww!”” (Jack Kerouac, On the Road)